I have uploaded another available photograph. as i read the dhyana verse i have some comments on it. in the verse there is one word SAROJADWAYAM. please refer this word. Sanskrit may be interpreted in several ways. You are considering she holds Veena in her two lotus hand. but if you consider she holds Veena and two lotus in her hands then this is picture for mahashodashi also. as there are no separate form for hadi or kadi vidya in case of panchadasi,there should not be separate form for para and maha shodashi as two are practically hadi and kadi shodashi.
please consider my point and give suggestions everybody.
Ideally, She should have only twelve hands. What we have in the verse is only ten hands. If we read vīṇāṁ saroja dvayaṁ (two lotus flowers), then it means that She holds two lotus flowers. Your interpretation is correct. I need to change the verse accordingly in my posting and I will do that. Thank you for pointing out this.
I want to know your opinion about one thing. here devi seats directly on sadasiva. some picture of tripurasundari made her seating on one lotus emerging from navel of siva. which one is more correct ?i have to tell my artist accordingly. please reply soon .
She sits directly on Sadashiva as nothing contrary to this available in any of the Scriptures I know. There is no reference to a lotus emerging from the navel of Sadhashiva. He is explained only as a plank and hence the question of lotus does not arise.
Yes, I wanted to discuss that with you. There is no hood for Her in any of the dhyana verses. It can be removed. Thanks for your exemplary thoughts. Hope She ultimately appears in flesh and blood to all of us and shower Her Grace.